public/print_hej
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update Memory Usage Over Time charts with actual data from timeline files

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ein Anderssono
2026-04-23 10:11:39 +02:00
parent be6f32fd74
commit 9c0e2f4dda
1 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
README.md
+8 -8
View File
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "C - Memory Usage Over Time" title "C - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 12 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 12
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 1 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 1
line [0.0] line [0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.2, 0.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** C uses practically no memory and executes in 11ms. Memory remains stable at 0 MB throughout execution. **Analysis:** C uses practically no memory and executes in 11ms. Memory remains stable at 0 MB throughout execution.
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "Assembly - Memory Usage Over Time" title "Assembly - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 20 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 20
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 1 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 1
line [0.0] line [0.9]
``` ```
**Analysis:** Assembly shows similar performance to C and Rust with minimal memory. **Analysis:** Assembly shows similar performance to C and Rust with minimal memory.
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "Haskell - Memory Usage Over Time" title "Haskell - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 8 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 8
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 12 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 12
line [10.5] line [0.2, 9.7, 0.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** Haskell is fast (49ms) but uses significantly more memory (10.5 MB) due to runtime and garbage collector. **Analysis:** Haskell is fast (49ms) but uses significantly more memory (10.5 MB) due to runtime and garbage collector.
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "Dart - Memory Usage Over Time" title "Dart - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 12 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 12
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 11 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 11
line [9.1] line [0.2, 7.9, 10.8, 10.8, 10.8, 10.8, 10.8, 0.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** Dart shows higher memory usage (9.1 MB) but maintains good performance thanks to JIT compilation. **Analysis:** Dart shows higher memory usage (9.1 MB) but maintains good performance thanks to JIT compilation.
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "Elixir - Memory Usage Over Time" title "Elixir - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 300 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 300
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3
line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0] line [0.5, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** Elixir is slower (338ms) but shows very stable memory usage at 2 MB throughout execution. The BEAM VM provides predictable memory usage. **Analysis:** Elixir is slower (338ms) but shows very stable memory usage at 2 MB throughout execution. The BEAM VM provides predictable memory usage.
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "TypeScript - Memory Usage Over Time" title "TypeScript - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 1500 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 1500
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3
line [1.9, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0] line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** TypeScript is slowest (1780ms) but shows an interesting memory profile: starts lower (1.9 MB) and quickly stabilizes at 2 MB. **Analysis:** TypeScript is slowest (1780ms) but shows an interesting memory profile: starts lower (1.9 MB) and quickly stabilizes at 2 MB.
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "Scala - Memory Usage Over Time" title "Scala - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 360 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 360
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3
line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0] line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** Scala on JVM shows stable memory usage but slower execution due to JVM startup time. **Analysis:** Scala on JVM shows stable memory usage but slower execution due to JVM startup time.
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ xychart-beta
title "JavaScript - Memory Usage Over Time" title "JavaScript - Memory Usage Over Time"
x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 500 x-axis "Time (ms)" 0 --> 500
y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3 y-axis "Memory (MB)" 0 --> 3
line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 0.0] line [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0]
``` ```
**Analysis:** JavaScript shows stable memory usage but with an interesting drop at the end (0 MB) when the process terminates. **Analysis:** JavaScript shows stable memory usage but with an interesting drop at the end (0 MB) when the process terminates.