public/print_hej
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Remove language-specific content from reports

Browse Source 
- Updated update_reports.sh to remove Performance Analysis section
- Regenerated all reports (1, 2, 5, 10, 100, 1000, 2000 decimals)
- All reports now have identical structure for 100% comparability
- No language-specific observations or commentary
- Only raw data tables remain
This commit is contained in:
Ein Anderssono
2026-04-23 13:44:58 +02:00
parent a9260f5b01
commit 443172606b
8 changed files with 1 additions and 137 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
reports/1000_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | Scala | 372 | 56661333 | JIT |
| 32 | TypeScript | 990 | 225329152 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_1000_output.txt`.
reports/100_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | Scala | 344 | 55470762 | JIT |
| 32 | TypeScript | 931 | 218868394 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_100_output.txt`.
reports/10_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | Scala | 351 | 55274154 | JIT |
| 32 | TypeScript | 878 | 218234880 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_10_output.txt`.
reports/1_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -40,23 +40,6 @@
| 17 | Erlang | 176 | 77359786 | Interpreted |
| 18 | Elixir | 401 | 89205418 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_1_output.txt`.
reports/2000_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | JavaScript | 498 | 55252309 | Interpreted |
| 32 | TypeScript | 1296 | 223188309 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_2000_output.txt`.
reports/2_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | Elixir | 379 | 89369258 | Interpreted |
| 32 | TypeScript | 904 | 217716053 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_2_output.txt`.
reports/5_decimals.md
-17
View File
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
| 31 | Scala | 386 | 55995050 | JIT |
| 32 | TypeScript | 886 | 217841664 | Interpreted |
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in `reports/run_5_output.txt`.
update_reports.sh
+1 -18
View File
@@ -79,26 +79,9 @@ EOF
printf "| %d | %s | %s | %s | %s |\n", rank, lang, time, mem, type
}' >> "$output_file"
# Add performance analysis
# Add detailed results section
cat >> "$output_file" << EOF
### Performance Analysis
**Top Performers:**
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
- Minimal memory usage for native code
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
**Memory Efficiency:**
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
**Key Findings:**
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
## Detailed Results
See the full test output in \`reports/run_${decimals}_output.txt\`.