Remove language-specific content from reports
- Updated update_reports.sh to remove Performance Analysis section - Regenerated all reports (1, 2, 5, 10, 100, 1000, 2000 decimals) - All reports now have identical structure for 100% comparability - No language-specific observations or commentary - Only raw data tables remain
This commit is contained in:
Ein Anderssono
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | Scala | 372 | 56661333 | JIT |
|
| 31 | Scala | 372 | 56661333 | JIT |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 990 | 225329152 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 990 | 225329152 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_1000_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_1000_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | Scala | 344 | 55470762 | JIT |
|
| 31 | Scala | 344 | 55470762 | JIT |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 931 | 218868394 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 931 | 218868394 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_100_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_100_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | Scala | 351 | 55274154 | JIT |
|
| 31 | Scala | 351 | 55274154 | JIT |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 878 | 218234880 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 878 | 218234880 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_10_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_10_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -40,23 +40,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 17 | Erlang | 176 | 77359786 | Interpreted |
|
| 17 | Erlang | 176 | 77359786 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
| 18 | Elixir | 401 | 89205418 | Interpreted |
|
| 18 | Elixir | 401 | 89205418 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_1_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_1_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | JavaScript | 498 | 55252309 | Interpreted |
|
| 31 | JavaScript | 498 | 55252309 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 1296 | 223188309 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 1296 | 223188309 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_2000_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_2000_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | Elixir | 379 | 89369258 | Interpreted |
|
| 31 | Elixir | 379 | 89369258 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 904 | 217716053 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 904 | 217716053 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_2_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_2_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -54,23 +54,6 @@
|
|||||||
| 31 | Scala | 386 | 55995050 | JIT |
|
| 31 | Scala | 386 | 55995050 | JIT |
|
||||||
| 32 | TypeScript | 886 | 217841664 | Interpreted |
|
| 32 | TypeScript | 886 | 217841664 | Interpreted |
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in `reports/run_5_output.txt`.
|
See the full test output in `reports/run_5_output.txt`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
+1
-18
@@ -79,26 +79,9 @@ EOF
|
|||||||
printf "| %d | %s | %s | %s | %s |\n", rank, lang, time, mem, type
|
printf "| %d | %s | %s | %s | %s |\n", rank, lang, time, mem, type
|
||||||
}' >> "$output_file"
|
}' >> "$output_file"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Add performance analysis
|
# Add detailed results section
|
||||||
cat >> "$output_file" << EOF
|
cat >> "$output_file" << EOF
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Performance Analysis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Top Performers:**
|
|
||||||
- Fastest execution times for compiled languages
|
|
||||||
- Minimal memory usage for native code
|
|
||||||
- Consistent performance across decimal levels
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Memory Efficiency:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages: 1-6 MB
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages: 14-236 MB
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages: 2-29 MB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Key Findings:**
|
|
||||||
- Compiled languages dominate in both speed and memory efficiency
|
|
||||||
- JIT languages show moderate performance with higher memory usage
|
|
||||||
- Interpreted languages vary widely in performance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Detailed Results
|
## Detailed Results
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
See the full test output in \`reports/run_${decimals}_output.txt\`.
|
See the full test output in \`reports/run_${decimals}_output.txt\`.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user